human sacrifices. - racyonaliści modern era, not a reduction zadowolnieni Jehovah God to the level of purely national (now Monotheism) moreover, tried to demonstrate the immoral external worship, which gave him Hebreowie. Among other things, J. Soury racyonalistami claimed that the people of Israel to God the sacrifice of the people. It is true that visited by Israelites, who, surrounded bałwochwalczymi Chananejczykami, could not resist the evil example and let themselves be carried away by not only polytheism, but accompanied by a terrible habits, among which we find human sacrifice, however, derive from this fact the conclusion that God Hebreowie filed victims of the people, it would mean as much as the claim that in today's European countries allowed people to murder, because here and there, there are such killings. The belief in Jehova expressly forbade human sacrifice (Lev. XX, 25, Deut. XII, 31), and under penalty of death, and talking about the victims of these cruel, this belief appears in them the habit, no longer national, but foreign, from which Hebreów wish to protect.
racyonaliści However, seeing the impossibility of relying on the idolatrous sacrifices made to Molech, and not Jehovah, try to cite some fact in which they want to see human sacrifices, made at the behest of and in honor of Jehovah:
lo. Sacrifice of Abraham: it-is the only example in the Bible, in which the victim seeks Jehova man, but does so only to the temptation of Abraham, that is, to try his faith, moreover, the same way the end of this sacrifice shows how the horror is Jehova human sacrifice.
2-o. Wedding Jephthah, silent no certainty that Jephthah promised and fulfilled human sacrifice, but even if he committed this crime, and in this case it still would be isolated-it's just an accident, generally condemned in no way unable to be assigned to Judaism (now Article. Jephthah),
3-o. Presentation made by Agag and Samuel rather read a description of the event in the Bible (I Reg. XV), to see that it was a political act, not a religious sacrifice: God has commanded to exterminate Amalecytów, Samuel, killing Agag, filled only God's command, and repaired the disobedience of Saul, who freed the king from death Amaiecytów.
4-o. If Gabaonitowie sentenced to death seven descendants of Saul (II King. XXI), it was in revenge for the treatment of this king with them, "you probably do not have better evidence, says Vigouroux, to convert a penalty in the offering, and the gallows at the altar."
5-o. In-sacrifice of the firstborn Jehovie want racyonaliści seen recollection of human sacrifice, which formerly had to exist, but the ratio has invented Ciz racyonaliści for themselves that they were needed, in reality, the Bible clearly teaches us that the first-born of the people visited by redeemed, and the firstborn of the animals submitted Jehovie a sacrifice, in remembrance of that fateful day, when God for deliverance his people, his death, visited all the firstborn of Egypt, from the firstborn of the people unto the firstborn of the animals. (Exodus 1913 to 1915).
6-0. Wherein innem is circumcision, says Soury, if not certain transformation of the victims of (human), produced from the need to effect more lenient manners? - For a while we notice that the beginning and the end of this religious rite clearly described in Genesis (XVII, 10); indeed, it existed long before Jephthah.
7-o. But here's a new argument, invented by J. Soury 's: "Throughout duration of the monarchy, he says, there were human sacrifices ... especially in the valley of Ben-Hinnom ... There was a famous Tophet, kind of fire of the altar, or sacred fire, sustained by the priests. These are the words Izaiasza: Yes, since yesterday (long) prepared Tophet is prepared for Moloch, it is deep and wide. Stack's no fire and the wood in abundance, as a breath of Jahveh yield sulfur stream. For this is a stack-Hebreowie threw his firstborn. Jahveh, the sacrificial flame, they devoured the victim. "
Therefore tłómaczenia Soury'ego enough to give accurate. The importance of the passage of the Bible: we're talking about Assyryjczykach who have an attack on Israel, the prophet, trying to predict their failure, it turns a pile ready to devour their bodies already, "Because it is the nagotowati Topheth of yesterday, the King prepared for the deep, were extended. Podniata iego fire wood s lot: poddymanie the Lord as a river of sulfur Burn them. "(Isa. xxxi, 33). Not a trace here, as can be seen, human sacrifices! How then could Soury change in this way under Izaiasza? It is easy to be understood as a comparison, both tłómaczenia: forward then Soury by Topheth tłómaczy word that, according to the best hebraistów, is only illustrative expression to denote the place where the corpses were burned, then reads it instead Molek Melek, thereby introduces Moloch, where it is mentioned about the king (Melek), Assyria, and finally tłóinaczac baar expression by burning, he forgets the genitive of the word: - forget however, very important because it gives the part of the sentence, underlined in the translation Soury'ego, the importance of so ambiguous and so terrifying that it can be inferred whatever he wants to.
These errors in translation are so visible and so important that today's great Orientalist, Vigouroux, despite all his temperance, he considers it to be the greatest nonsense, they even racyonaliści such notables in this direction, as Gesenius, Knobel, Hetzig, Ewald, etc., everyone recognizes that the above urywkowi Izaiasza can not give a different meaning, just what kind we gave above; and as the last argument is the strongest Soury'ego of those which we have had to fight, therefore we must zawnioskować about human sacrifices in Hebreów same as racyonalista Wellhausen was forced to confess on the victim's firstborn: "This terrible ransom can not find any trace. "- (now Vigouroux, Bibi et deconvertes Vol III; Billuart, De religione, digressio de voto lephte; Schegg, Der Prophet Jesaia, 1.1, p. 316). (Duplessy).
XWS
racyonaliści However, seeing the impossibility of relying on the idolatrous sacrifices made to Molech, and not Jehovah, try to cite some fact in which they want to see human sacrifices, made at the behest of and in honor of Jehovah:
lo. Sacrifice of Abraham: it-is the only example in the Bible, in which the victim seeks Jehova man, but does so only to the temptation of Abraham, that is, to try his faith, moreover, the same way the end of this sacrifice shows how the horror is Jehova human sacrifice.
2-o. Wedding Jephthah, silent no certainty that Jephthah promised and fulfilled human sacrifice, but even if he committed this crime, and in this case it still would be isolated-it's just an accident, generally condemned in no way unable to be assigned to Judaism (now Article. Jephthah),
3-o. Presentation made by Agag and Samuel rather read a description of the event in the Bible (I Reg. XV), to see that it was a political act, not a religious sacrifice: God has commanded to exterminate Amalecytów, Samuel, killing Agag, filled only God's command, and repaired the disobedience of Saul, who freed the king from death Amaiecytów.
4-o. If Gabaonitowie sentenced to death seven descendants of Saul (II King. XXI), it was in revenge for the treatment of this king with them, "you probably do not have better evidence, says Vigouroux, to convert a penalty in the offering, and the gallows at the altar."
5-o. In-sacrifice of the firstborn Jehovie want racyonaliści seen recollection of human sacrifice, which formerly had to exist, but the ratio has invented Ciz racyonaliści for themselves that they were needed, in reality, the Bible clearly teaches us that the first-born of the people visited by redeemed, and the firstborn of the animals submitted Jehovie a sacrifice, in remembrance of that fateful day, when God for deliverance his people, his death, visited all the firstborn of Egypt, from the firstborn of the people unto the firstborn of the animals. (Exodus 1913 to 1915).
6-0. Wherein innem is circumcision, says Soury, if not certain transformation of the victims of (human), produced from the need to effect more lenient manners? - For a while we notice that the beginning and the end of this religious rite clearly described in Genesis (XVII, 10); indeed, it existed long before Jephthah.
7-o. But here's a new argument, invented by J. Soury 's: "Throughout duration of the monarchy, he says, there were human sacrifices ... especially in the valley of Ben-Hinnom ... There was a famous Tophet, kind of fire of the altar, or sacred fire, sustained by the priests. These are the words Izaiasza: Yes, since yesterday (long) prepared Tophet is prepared for Moloch, it is deep and wide. Stack's no fire and the wood in abundance, as a breath of Jahveh yield sulfur stream. For this is a stack-Hebreowie threw his firstborn. Jahveh, the sacrificial flame, they devoured the victim. "
Therefore tłómaczenia Soury'ego enough to give accurate. The importance of the passage of the Bible: we're talking about Assyryjczykach who have an attack on Israel, the prophet, trying to predict their failure, it turns a pile ready to devour their bodies already, "Because it is the nagotowati Topheth of yesterday, the King prepared for the deep, were extended. Podniata iego fire wood s lot: poddymanie the Lord as a river of sulfur Burn them. "(Isa. xxxi, 33). Not a trace here, as can be seen, human sacrifices! How then could Soury change in this way under Izaiasza? It is easy to be understood as a comparison, both tłómaczenia: forward then Soury by Topheth tłómaczy word that, according to the best hebraistów, is only illustrative expression to denote the place where the corpses were burned, then reads it instead Molek Melek, thereby introduces Moloch, where it is mentioned about the king (Melek), Assyria, and finally tłóinaczac baar expression by burning, he forgets the genitive of the word: - forget however, very important because it gives the part of the sentence, underlined in the translation Soury'ego, the importance of so ambiguous and so terrifying that it can be inferred whatever he wants to.
These errors in translation are so visible and so important that today's great Orientalist, Vigouroux, despite all his temperance, he considers it to be the greatest nonsense, they even racyonaliści such notables in this direction, as Gesenius, Knobel, Hetzig, Ewald, etc., everyone recognizes that the above urywkowi Izaiasza can not give a different meaning, just what kind we gave above; and as the last argument is the strongest Soury'ego of those which we have had to fight, therefore we must zawnioskować about human sacrifices in Hebreów same as racyonalista Wellhausen was forced to confess on the victim's firstborn: "This terrible ransom can not find any trace. "- (now Vigouroux, Bibi et deconvertes Vol III; Billuart, De religione, digressio de voto lephte; Schegg, Der Prophet Jesaia, 1.1, p. 316). (Duplessy).
XWS
0 comments:
Post a Comment