DIVINE IMAGES Miracle Mother. - "At the end of last century, says Father Matignon (La Question du Surnaturel, 3 part. Ch. VII, p, 507j in the paintings of the Virgin Mary in Italy observed a strange phenomenon. Dowries, images seemed to come alive, raise your eyes, tears profusely flowing, clear and powerful and wonderful similar symptoms were becoming a sequence of revelation that the once predicting some misfortune, then again arouses joyful hope. Pius VI reduced to. established a commission houses, designed to track and describe the fact that the divisions in the sight of the crowds converging from all parts of the world. This is what everyone was seen, and claimed consignment certificate with the top nine witnesses. "
In memory of those miracles włas'nie the Day of Our Lady of Lourdes (BMV Prodigiorum), or the Queen of Peace, which celebrated the feast of the Roman clergy dn. July 9.
In 1850 dn. May 11, and the next day asked for the attention of the world nadzwyczajnemi symptoms image of the Virgin Mary in Rimini, painted on canvas in 1796, having a height of 60 centimeters and 72 centimeters wide. Mary's face changed and expressing various emotions. Were particularly pronounced movements of the eyelids. Witness to this fact there were plenty of people who saw it all in one and the same time and in the same way. Ribbon was attached to the eye and the other the measures taken to make sure that the fact that they are not the result jakiejś'hallucynacyi or the play of light. Bishop of Rimini created the commission houses and heard the testimony of a hundred picked up and because of his intellect and character perfectly wiarogodnyeh witnesses, dn. 11 January 1851 issued a decree adjudicating the truth of the fact eyelid movement on rzeczonym image. At the request of Bishop Pius IX allowed Brief dated. 25 July 1850, a solemn picture crown.
fact they represent only a piece of those jakiebyśmy could cite. Raw and commission houses, marked to investigate them, do not allow them to deny, or at least does not allow you to deny the seriousness of the human witness, - Anyway., Fraud or circulate hallucynacya puszczały Similar stories sometimes literally, a reality which was, however, questionable. Usually
ecclesiastical authority undertook measures to advance investigate the apparitions. When and in these cases was mixed, it seemed rather to its courts reject some credulous people from an outbreak of bad and doubtful miracles, rather than to confirm the faith of the crowds.
It is also for example Benedict XIV (De Canonization sanctorum p. 2 l. IV, c. 32, u. 4), in turn, cites five decrees kongregacyi Rites, rejecting miracles like. The first was issued in a decree dated. 4 April 1626, concerning MB image in Arras, which, as was said of himself seemed to sweat. - The second is a decree dated. 2 (5 February 1623, a Recommended bishop of Pistoia, that removed the statue of Jesus, who, with the testimony of many people, tears were shed, - The third is the decree dated. 10 September 1630, he rejects the miracle of a drop of blood to see the name of coming from the head of Christ in Spoletto, crowned with thorns. The fourth such a decree is a decree dated. 9 July 1633, a Recommended hide picture of the Virgin Mary. Fifth and finally of those decrees kongregacyi is the decree of 22 November 1687, which held that the fact , that the statue of St. Francis blood flowed in the manner wonderful, is not justified.
These examples show that the Holy See welcomes the fact that only the type of when they find indisputable data. And since some of these facts, adopted, there is no evidence that they were true and did not give up in a natural way tłómaczyć. Moreover, the Holy See does not dictate an obligation to anyone to believe in the reality of these miracles, and the courts on this subject seems not to arrogate to himself any pretensyi to infallibility.
(JMA Vacant).
XWS
In memory of those miracles włas'nie the Day of Our Lady of Lourdes (BMV Prodigiorum), or the Queen of Peace, which celebrated the feast of the Roman clergy dn. July 9.
In 1850 dn. May 11, and the next day asked for the attention of the world nadzwyczajnemi symptoms image of the Virgin Mary in Rimini, painted on canvas in 1796, having a height of 60 centimeters and 72 centimeters wide. Mary's face changed and expressing various emotions. Were particularly pronounced movements of the eyelids. Witness to this fact there were plenty of people who saw it all in one and the same time and in the same way. Ribbon was attached to the eye and the other the measures taken to make sure that the fact that they are not the result jakiejś'hallucynacyi or the play of light. Bishop of Rimini created the commission houses and heard the testimony of a hundred picked up and because of his intellect and character perfectly wiarogodnyeh witnesses, dn. 11 January 1851 issued a decree adjudicating the truth of the fact eyelid movement on rzeczonym image. At the request of Bishop Pius IX allowed Brief dated. 25 July 1850, a solemn picture crown.
fact they represent only a piece of those jakiebyśmy could cite. Raw and commission houses, marked to investigate them, do not allow them to deny, or at least does not allow you to deny the seriousness of the human witness, - Anyway., Fraud or circulate hallucynacya puszczały Similar stories sometimes literally, a reality which was, however, questionable. Usually
ecclesiastical authority undertook measures to advance investigate the apparitions. When and in these cases was mixed, it seemed rather to its courts reject some credulous people from an outbreak of bad and doubtful miracles, rather than to confirm the faith of the crowds.
It is also for example Benedict XIV (De Canonization sanctorum p. 2 l. IV, c. 32, u. 4), in turn, cites five decrees kongregacyi Rites, rejecting miracles like. The first was issued in a decree dated. 4 April 1626, concerning MB image in Arras, which, as was said of himself seemed to sweat. - The second is a decree dated. 2 (5 February 1623, a Recommended bishop of Pistoia, that removed the statue of Jesus, who, with the testimony of many people, tears were shed, - The third is the decree dated. 10 September 1630, he rejects the miracle of a drop of blood to see the name of coming from the head of Christ in Spoletto, crowned with thorns. The fourth such a decree is a decree dated. 9 July 1633, a Recommended hide picture of the Virgin Mary. Fifth and finally of those decrees kongregacyi is the decree of 22 November 1687, which held that the fact , that the statue of St. Francis blood flowed in the manner wonderful, is not justified.
These examples show that the Holy See welcomes the fact that only the type of when they find indisputable data. And since some of these facts, adopted, there is no evidence that they were true and did not give up in a natural way tłómaczyć. Moreover, the Holy See does not dictate an obligation to anyone to believe in the reality of these miracles, and the courts on this subject seems not to arrogate to himself any pretensyi to infallibility.
(JMA Vacant).
XWS
0 comments:
Post a Comment