Nepomuk. (St. John N. and infallibility of the Pope). - St. John of Nepomuk, the patron saint of the Czech Republic and the first martyr of the seal of confession, was canonized by Benedict XIII d. 17 March 1729 after having carried out a canonization process by all the canonical rules. Meanwhile, provided by the opinion of today are very widespread and strongly supported, that the canonization process supposedly contain significant errors, which they consider enemies of the Church to be incompatible with the dogma of papal infallibility.
And, indeed, a personage whose death is placed on the process of canonization in 1383 and has been declared public holidays, does not exist in reality, the only historical Nepomuceńskim John would be John of Nepomuk, or Nepomuk, wikaryusz General Archbishop pragskiego, Jenzensteina, at the behest of King Wenceslas Mołdawy thrown in the year 1393, for a long time and then celebrated Mass. de Requiem at St. Wit. Since a clear distinction between the process of canonization of St. John of Nepomuk, the only historical personage from that. announced a sacred right, the error here is obvious and extremely important. Before we answer this objection, the state's paint the brief case.
All agree that the Archbishop pragski. Jan Jenzenstein (1381 - 1396) was wikaryusza General, named John of Nepomuk Poniuk either. Between 1372 and 1393, the name of the wikaryusza General's repeated often in the archives of the metropolitan pragskiem (Libri erectionum), where he signed the files fundacyi, zowiąc the "Johannes Wellfini (fiiius) de Pomuk." He was a doctor of law (decretorum cloclor) and general wikaryuszem in 1389 and was archidyakonem in Saaz in 1390, and as was also archidyakon "Canonicus Pragensis ad extra," which means that the Canon IVF but not the obligation rezydencyi titular. It is unknown whether Pomuk name means the city where he was born, or just the usual family name. In 1393, he was tortured and thrown Mołdawy at the behest of the German Emperor and King of Bohemia, Wenceslas, for being against his will confirmed the election of a new abbot of the monastery in Kladruby.
This fact is recounted in detail in the complaint, which, soon afterwards the archbishop wrote to the pap. Boniface IX. Long after the death of the celebrated General wikaryusza in st. Wit Masses. de Requiem for the repose of his soul. Nobody knows anything for sure about finding his body in the river currents Mołdawy, but it is. buried in the cathedral. The name of the Blessed Martyr, or granted him three times over the centuries, namely, local in its application to the Holy apostate Archbishop., 2-o archbishop of that belief, written by a canon regular, and 3-ow donacyjnym act of the 1374, in which some unknown hand has placed the inscription: "B. Joannes Nep. fecit me, "being mean that St. John Nepomuk act wrote.
Archbishop in its application, the original of which is on file at the Vatican, says that his wikaryusz general was murdered and thrown into Mołdawy the orders of Wenceslas for being confirmed by the new abbot of Kladrubów without waiting for the consent of the king says nothing about secret confession., nor any mention of another John Nepomucenie, which supposedly was to be martyred ten years earlier by that same king.
since the mid eighteenth century, slowly made a name among German Catholics believe that the process of canonization of a typographical error occurred, and that one should not assume, as does the process of canonization, the two figures under the name of John of Nepomuk, both at the same time the canons Visegrad, both thrown into the Mołdawy at the behest of that same king Wacławaa one in 1383, the second in 1393, both having grave in St. Wit, and both declared saints or blessed. And there was only one John of Nepomuk, wikaryusz General Archbishop pragskiego, martyred in the year 1393, but the actual secret cause of his martyrdom was a refusal to betray the queen of confession, while the official reason, revealed, and all known, was the confirmation charged Kladruby. This belief is now far more widespread than the first.
In the latest instance of Catholic defenders of the latter-convincing us quote Dr. Ginzel'aw Encykl. Wetzera and Weltego historian Konstantymi Hoefler, in two of his works, published in 1856 and 1861; Adolf Wurfel'a 1862, Clement Borovy'ego 1878; Thomas Nowak'a 1871, and scholar Anthony Frind'a canon, later bishop Lutomierzyckiego, in many writings proclaimed the years 1861, 1873 and 1879. Evidence of the latter author recognized and accepted by writing: stories-Polit.-Blatter, Mainz Catholic, Jesuit Stimmen aus Maria-Laach, etc. The benefit of the other reviews from that time we know only one trial under the title: Controversia de S. Joanna Nepomuk, the work of anonymous (1881) and O. hearing Schmude (Zeitschrift fur kathol. Theol. Innsbruek. cont. 1883). Well
enemies of the Catholic Church from those hearings to have swindled pohopu an attack on papal infallibility and the value of the canonization process, "the Pope, they say, was mistaken veneration of the faithful and presented the personage who had just legendowe existence."
understood that the difficulty exists only in the opinion of those who suspect the existence of only one of the personalities the name of John of Nepomuk, but even in this difficult The said opinion is not very frightening. We could stop here because the statement that papal infallibility in kanonizowaniu Saints is not true by the Church to be believed, and stated that it can be nieuznawać, and yet not be the same token, tem a heretic.
However, we do not want to limit on this answer, and that for this, that, together with all the theologians for a certain thing, we believe that the pope is infallible in kanonizowaniu Saints. But the freedom from error, this applies only to the fact that the person canonized sanctity and glory, which, she enjoys in heaven, as regards the details of dates and historical lessons, miracles, that no one considers to be the subject of papal infallibility. Thus, provided by Catholic doctrine, it is not impossible that the pope was mistaken in approving canonization process, or even the bull of canonization, placing the date of the martyrdom of the 1383 instead of the 1393, without giving the holy title wikaryusza general, thinking that he was. confessor of Queen Joan, instead of Queen Sophia, believing that this holy personage was different from any other contemporary personalities of that same name. - The Pope was infallible only in the decision that personage, who is venerated in the Czech Republic under the name of John of Nepomuk, was indeed holy, and that he enjoys the glory of heaven. Meanwhile, none of Both these opinions about these allegations are not doubts.
Although it is difficult to deny that, provided by the widespread belief very, Masses. de Requiem was not celebrated for the repose of St. John of Nepomuk, but this fact does not prove anything against his holiness, proves it's just simply that in the first days after his death, his holiness is not generally considered to be certain. This case therefore has nothing to do with papal infallibility - and the only ill will, or ignorance of mind could attach it here.
Why, you say the same about you juice importance of Catholics generally attach to the outcome of the processes of canonization. If true is the opinion which holds that personality, known under the name of John of Nepomuk is true, then the process carried out on the patron saint of Bohemia contains quite numerous and serious errors. But because the otherwise the rules laid down by the Church were at this event as accurately maintained as legal proceedings conducted by a very enlightened people, especially Prosper Lambertini, later reduced to. Benedict XIV, and it's at an age when historical criticism was in great respect, because you need here only suppose that, even in the resolutions of the kind of human weakness does not disappear, and that, despite all precautions, the error pushes them sometimes. Catholic theologians have never had anything to the contrary is not contended, and the fact that occupies us here, if it is real, just proves that wisdom does anyone who stands in similar cases strictly on the basis of rules and not supposed infallibility where the Church does not want to have her.
But is it something completely certain that the queen's confessor, martyr secret confession, and wikaryusz General are one and the same person? Are these supposed errors attributed to the process kanonizacyjnemu are true and real? Mentioned above, O. Schmude in the aforementioned work, it turns out that there are serious and numerous reasons for doubt about temperature. Adhuc sub judice November est! The dispute has not yet finished.
(object X. Bp. Nowodworski; Encykl. Bone. T. VIII, "John of Nepomuk." - Geschichtsltigen, ed. Last.) (JB. Jaugey).
XWS
And, indeed, a personage whose death is placed on the process of canonization in 1383 and has been declared public holidays, does not exist in reality, the only historical Nepomuceńskim John would be John of Nepomuk, or Nepomuk, wikaryusz General Archbishop pragskiego, Jenzensteina, at the behest of King Wenceslas Mołdawy thrown in the year 1393, for a long time and then celebrated Mass. de Requiem at St. Wit. Since a clear distinction between the process of canonization of St. John of Nepomuk, the only historical personage from that. announced a sacred right, the error here is obvious and extremely important. Before we answer this objection, the state's paint the brief case.
All agree that the Archbishop pragski. Jan Jenzenstein (1381 - 1396) was wikaryusza General, named John of Nepomuk Poniuk either. Between 1372 and 1393, the name of the wikaryusza General's repeated often in the archives of the metropolitan pragskiem (Libri erectionum), where he signed the files fundacyi, zowiąc the "Johannes Wellfini (fiiius) de Pomuk." He was a doctor of law (decretorum cloclor) and general wikaryuszem in 1389 and was archidyakonem in Saaz in 1390, and as was also archidyakon "Canonicus Pragensis ad extra," which means that the Canon IVF but not the obligation rezydencyi titular. It is unknown whether Pomuk name means the city where he was born, or just the usual family name. In 1393, he was tortured and thrown Mołdawy at the behest of the German Emperor and King of Bohemia, Wenceslas, for being against his will confirmed the election of a new abbot of the monastery in Kladruby.
This fact is recounted in detail in the complaint, which, soon afterwards the archbishop wrote to the pap. Boniface IX. Long after the death of the celebrated General wikaryusza in st. Wit Masses. de Requiem for the repose of his soul. Nobody knows anything for sure about finding his body in the river currents Mołdawy, but it is. buried in the cathedral. The name of the Blessed Martyr, or granted him three times over the centuries, namely, local in its application to the Holy apostate Archbishop., 2-o archbishop of that belief, written by a canon regular, and 3-ow donacyjnym act of the 1374, in which some unknown hand has placed the inscription: "B. Joannes Nep. fecit me, "being mean that St. John Nepomuk act wrote.
Archbishop in its application, the original of which is on file at the Vatican, says that his wikaryusz general was murdered and thrown into Mołdawy the orders of Wenceslas for being confirmed by the new abbot of Kladrubów without waiting for the consent of the king says nothing about secret confession., nor any mention of another John Nepomucenie, which supposedly was to be martyred ten years earlier by that same king.
since the mid eighteenth century, slowly made a name among German Catholics believe that the process of canonization of a typographical error occurred, and that one should not assume, as does the process of canonization, the two figures under the name of John of Nepomuk, both at the same time the canons Visegrad, both thrown into the Mołdawy at the behest of that same king Wacławaa one in 1383, the second in 1393, both having grave in St. Wit, and both declared saints or blessed. And there was only one John of Nepomuk, wikaryusz General Archbishop pragskiego, martyred in the year 1393, but the actual secret cause of his martyrdom was a refusal to betray the queen of confession, while the official reason, revealed, and all known, was the confirmation charged Kladruby. This belief is now far more widespread than the first.
In the latest instance of Catholic defenders of the latter-convincing us quote Dr. Ginzel'aw Encykl. Wetzera and Weltego historian Konstantymi Hoefler, in two of his works, published in 1856 and 1861; Adolf Wurfel'a 1862, Clement Borovy'ego 1878; Thomas Nowak'a 1871, and scholar Anthony Frind'a canon, later bishop Lutomierzyckiego, in many writings proclaimed the years 1861, 1873 and 1879. Evidence of the latter author recognized and accepted by writing: stories-Polit.-Blatter, Mainz Catholic, Jesuit Stimmen aus Maria-Laach, etc. The benefit of the other reviews from that time we know only one trial under the title: Controversia de S. Joanna Nepomuk, the work of anonymous (1881) and O. hearing Schmude (Zeitschrift fur kathol. Theol. Innsbruek. cont. 1883). Well
enemies of the Catholic Church from those hearings to have swindled pohopu an attack on papal infallibility and the value of the canonization process, "the Pope, they say, was mistaken veneration of the faithful and presented the personage who had just legendowe existence."
understood that the difficulty exists only in the opinion of those who suspect the existence of only one of the personalities the name of John of Nepomuk, but even in this difficult The said opinion is not very frightening. We could stop here because the statement that papal infallibility in kanonizowaniu Saints is not true by the Church to be believed, and stated that it can be nieuznawać, and yet not be the same token, tem a heretic.
However, we do not want to limit on this answer, and that for this, that, together with all the theologians for a certain thing, we believe that the pope is infallible in kanonizowaniu Saints. But the freedom from error, this applies only to the fact that the person canonized sanctity and glory, which, she enjoys in heaven, as regards the details of dates and historical lessons, miracles, that no one considers to be the subject of papal infallibility. Thus, provided by Catholic doctrine, it is not impossible that the pope was mistaken in approving canonization process, or even the bull of canonization, placing the date of the martyrdom of the 1383 instead of the 1393, without giving the holy title wikaryusza general, thinking that he was. confessor of Queen Joan, instead of Queen Sophia, believing that this holy personage was different from any other contemporary personalities of that same name. - The Pope was infallible only in the decision that personage, who is venerated in the Czech Republic under the name of John of Nepomuk, was indeed holy, and that he enjoys the glory of heaven. Meanwhile, none of Both these opinions about these allegations are not doubts.
Although it is difficult to deny that, provided by the widespread belief very, Masses. de Requiem was not celebrated for the repose of St. John of Nepomuk, but this fact does not prove anything against his holiness, proves it's just simply that in the first days after his death, his holiness is not generally considered to be certain. This case therefore has nothing to do with papal infallibility - and the only ill will, or ignorance of mind could attach it here.
Why, you say the same about you juice importance of Catholics generally attach to the outcome of the processes of canonization. If true is the opinion which holds that personality, known under the name of John of Nepomuk is true, then the process carried out on the patron saint of Bohemia contains quite numerous and serious errors. But because the otherwise the rules laid down by the Church were at this event as accurately maintained as legal proceedings conducted by a very enlightened people, especially Prosper Lambertini, later reduced to. Benedict XIV, and it's at an age when historical criticism was in great respect, because you need here only suppose that, even in the resolutions of the kind of human weakness does not disappear, and that, despite all precautions, the error pushes them sometimes. Catholic theologians have never had anything to the contrary is not contended, and the fact that occupies us here, if it is real, just proves that wisdom does anyone who stands in similar cases strictly on the basis of rules and not supposed infallibility where the Church does not want to have her.
But is it something completely certain that the queen's confessor, martyr secret confession, and wikaryusz General are one and the same person? Are these supposed errors attributed to the process kanonizacyjnemu are true and real? Mentioned above, O. Schmude in the aforementioned work, it turns out that there are serious and numerous reasons for doubt about temperature. Adhuc sub judice November est! The dispute has not yet finished.
(object X. Bp. Nowodworski; Encykl. Bone. T. VIII, "John of Nepomuk." - Geschichtsltigen, ed. Last.) (JB. Jaugey).
XWS
0 comments:
Post a Comment