JUDGEMENT OF THE CHURCH. - I. This expression was used to determine the various provisions of the ecclesiastical authorities as to whether faith or as to the morals and discipline of the church. Today the term is generally used to determine the decrees or judgments issued by those authorities in matters for faith is also called the rulings of these decrees and rulings dogmatycznemi faith. These rulings, provided by the Latin etymology of the word (defmitiones), are intended to define the boundaries of truth revealed by God and the obligation to adopt it, which to us pregnant. These rulings show "define" what belongs to faith, and what belongs to a free opinion: what is consistent with the infallible teaching of the Lord, Christ, and what is its opposite. - Decisions are twofold: the conciliar and papal, or to whether they were issued by the council, or a particular church or ecumenical, or by the Supreme Pastor of the congregation for all councils. The latter are divided even on the only personal decision, which came from the supreme pastor as a private teacher or as a component of the pastor of the Church, and the solemn decisions, public, ex cathedra that is authentic when they come out from paieża as the Pope, that is, as the pastor and teacher of the universal Church, which he wants to govern and who wants to teach the height of his apostolic vocation of the capital under their assystencyi and the Holy Spirit.
II. Decisions of the particular synods not infallible and of themselves are not immutable. - Decisions of the ecumenical councils, legally convened, chaired by the Pope to be completed and certified by him, to enjoy the privilege of infallibility and the temperature same token, binding on all Christians to take their act of faith, sincere and irrevocable. Nobody in the Catholic Church does not doubt about this science. After all, Christ had spoken to his apostles: "And I will ask ia Oyca, and give you another Comforter, to live with you forever. Spirit of truth. "(John XIV, 16);" when the Spirit of truth comes, he shall teach you all truth. "(John XVI, 13), and yet innem site:., And the gates of hell shall not prevail him. "(Matt. XVI, 18), ie the Church, which is" the pillar and the affirmation of truth. "(I Tim. III, 15).
obvious consequence of these promises and decisions is that the Church can not be wrong or misleading the faithful make the fullest and most solemn meeting of his teachers, the dogmatic decisions of their councils ecumenical. - This is just one of the infallible dogmatic judgments issued by one of the most ecumenical councils and najpóźniejszych by the Second Vatican Council in the Fourth sessyi d. 18 July 1870, a ruling which teaches us what we have should believe on the importance and seriousness of the decisions of the Pope, "Bishop of Rome, when he speaks ex cathedra, that is, when fulfilling the office of pastor and teacher of all Christians, under the highest apostolic severity, rules that any doctrine concerning faith or morals, should be wierzona by the universal Church, enjoys full, due to him in the promised Holy person. Peter asystencyi divine, that infallibility which the divine Redeemer wished His Church to be endowed, when determining the teaching concerning faith or morals, and therefore, the ruling bishop of Rome is unchangeable by themselves, not by consent of the Church. "Forward reminded Vatican great evidence of this science and known these words of Christ the Lord to St. Peter: "Thou art the rock iest, and tey rock zbuduię church Moy, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it" (Matt. XVI, 16). "Feed my sheep moie, moie sheep pasture" (John XVI, 15 - 17); "ia but I have prayed for thee that thy faith fail not, and you sometimes have turned up. confirm brethren, your "(Luke XXII, 32; - as a former ruling finest cathedrals, such as IV Sat. Constantinople, II Liońskiego and Florence, and became the custom of the Church - as well as continuing the proceedings themselves, even the Supreme Pastors of the Church Fathers that the rulings did not fail to ever show absolute obedience. - As we saw, and believed the Second Vatican Council clearly recalls the dogma of infallibility of the Church, and declares that this is not infallible enjoys another bishop of Rome in its dogmatic decrees, it also declares that the object of that infallibility is a doctrine relating to faith and morals, given to the beliefs of the whole Church, tem and the same token contained in the repository of divine revelation, not personal, but a genuine and public.
III. come across here for two sections of objections, some returned to the infallibility of judgments against the council, the second - striking the infallibility of the pope's decisions, lo not only deny that the ecumenical councils and the Church was infallible dispersed, (of something else where we say: ob. Article. Koncylia, church, etc.), but I say moreover that it is impossible to know when it really is an ecumenical council, and when it is not, that to the dogmatic statements are infallible, it would be necessary to jednozgodnie were taken, which is a thing unheard of in history, and will probably never happen in the future, that science podług all theologians, general council is the only infallible, if he has the infallibility of the pope, which again is doubtful, uncertain, because the Council The Vatican was unable to rule without falling temperature in the same token, some vicious circle of reasoning, that, moreover, all the conciliar decision can not avoid this sofistycznego proceedings; that finally, assuming the papal infallibility, the true and accepted as true, gathered at the Council of Bishops have nothing to judge, nothing to postanawiania, of which again shows the total elimination of any council's decisions, as it clearly appears from the decrees of Vatican Council, which shall be issued in the name of the pope's ruling, with simple approbatą Council. - 2-for papal infallibility That decision is doubtful, because all the Pope issued dogmatic decrees are uncertain. How can anyone believe in the personal infallibility of the human, similar to other people? And if this man has the conditions necessary to give something unmistakably, What is they are and who we infallibly zaręczy that these conditions tend to be preserved? But if there is any doubt in this respect, what shall be required to impose the faithful and the theologians? Who hindered to some nieroztropnemu pope to rule some details, which should not decide, or introduce new products on the faith and morals? What to do then between this pope is wrong adjudicating, and opposing him the bishops? Where will escape the conscience? Where is the fundamental stone of the Church, so many fights wstrzaśnionego?
lo answer, above all, that ekumeniczność councils is a fact very simple and easy to find (now Article. Koncylia). Decisions of councils that they are infallible, they need only be a conciliar, and will reliably takiemi if it will have a majority, including voice, read with the pope, without which there is none most of the council, the Church teaching, as the silent body without a head, a house without a stone Ceremony; unanimous vote would be a very welcome miracle, but not necessary.
- Decisions of the Church in relation to those privileges will not be a vicious circle, because before the Church declared immutable and infallible, and gave intelligent and convincing evidence of his supernatural authority and power of teaching the truth without przymieszki error. He could, therefore, the Church at Vatican ordered the infallibility of his superior does not thereby committing najmniejzego sofizmatu. Here we do not need to settle the theological issues still unsettled, namely whether, regardless of the Roman Pontiff, the body of bishops of the Church has appropriate gift of infallibility; enough of us to say ekumeniczność any council to be quite przeświadczonymi about his infallibility on the dogmatic. The taz as easily, even against the pope's infallible, we recognize the true nature of the doctrinal and legal judgments issued by the bishops in general council, one because of two things, or if those judgments are issued, the Pope had not yet revealed his sentence, and then the matter is not yet exaggerated, the bishops think about it with all the fullest freedom of conscience and faith, strictly speaking, is the effect of their decision, but only after the Pope's appeal, it becomes a high- and unchanging - or the pope delivered his now ex cathedra statement about the test kwestyi by bishops, and the latter can not, of course, think about it differently than the pope, but they can still, with his dignity to give their voices, their condones , its support of the rulings, they may just as he planted together with him, with him and just as he spread the truth, which he spreads around the world, for example, just the same as the priests together with the bishop celebrates the Sacred. eucharistic sacrifice, whether past or even today in the ceremony of priestly, as the bishop and with him, actually consecrate. Thus, although the head of the dogmatic judgments Sat Vatican says Pius IX's name, do not bother, however, that says there is also approbatę conciliar, sacro approbante concilio, and that she was there indeed was given, not as simple an obsequious acquiescence or applause, but as a real effect, and the true testimony of judges and witnesses , together with their supervisor authorized by God to rule the truth contained in the treasury of revelation.
second Thus, the decision of papal infallibility on Sat Vatican neither measure is uncertain, and its undeniable seriousness, it covers all of Pope's ruling, issued ex cathedra from the beginning chrystyanizmn, not that they were in the sleigh and responsible doubtful, but that could be such in relation to the minds that were not sufficiently convinced of these truths irrevocable value. Also unnecessary to add that all the dogmatic decrees, the capital of St. will be able to preach in the future, are already pledged to suddenly advance ruling from the same token, d. 13 July 1870, the truth that man is intrinsically fallible and error is a danger for him, from which It will never be able to protect itself. But is God is not infallible in its essence? Is he not strong enough for it to be able, if willing, to protect man from confusing or misleading or otherwise? Is he not good enough, wise enough to want in his church to prepare a safe haven for the human mind, miotanego waves of opinion and impacted by storms of doubt and negacyi? What he could do, he did, he tells us is the Gospel, and provides Tradycya states, and defines the church, and if the church is determined, ie, that he knows about temperature, holding it, does not need to be afraid of any denials or any weakness of his word, któreby can be frightening defeat him. Through the Holy Spirit. Secure the high, although the Pope is a man, but an enlightened man, and ruled by God, so that the ex cathedra he can decide the truth of God, then it is no longer a man like any other, but similar to those that God chose sometimes to its Members tlómaczów and his will to others. There-is neither pure nor omniscient, nor a miracle-worker, neither inspired nor a prophet, he is only just secured against the ordinary conditions of nature, in circumstances in which it comes to the teaching of the Church, by virtue of his office of Pastor of the universal, not every day and every moment of his life, not as each individual doctor of the Church or as an individual, but only as the Pope, ruling ex cathedra.
sure thing that before any decision is announced dogmatic, are to meet certain preliminary duties: the need to pray, reflect, investigate, inquire of the other, given that the pope is neither inspired nor any prophet. But God gives it that he meets these obligations, and does not allow him to neglect them. So when any decision will be issued by a pope to a healthy mind and freedom in their operations, all well preserved with the conditions laid down by God, but yet this fact alone will not constitute a decision. When they created reasonable doubt about the fact that when it is difficult to clearly above the papal decision to recognize traits of the ex cathedra, then either the pope himself, or his successor will light and the light of this doubt is complete: in the meantime while before it happens, tentative adopted a decree that must be respect and submission which religion prescribes, and which requires respect for the decrees, judgments lower than dogmatic, but higher than normal sentences canonist or theologian (now Article. "Congregation of Rome"). -Is thus unfounded fear zależenia from the pope in their imprudent decisions, the friend of change and novelty, tradycye niepamiętnego to their ancestors. Guardian of such a pope, a naturally dangerous, it will be a supernatural providence, which assystencya promised to Peter and his successors. It's shortcomings are not against the truth, or at least, if you go for his passion, his project will not issue any ruling to the contrary revelation. After all, Christ prayed for Peter in the person made that did not stop his faith and to be able to strengthen his brothers in the faith. So there you will find a never to supervisor, who would as Head of the Church taught error or herezyi. They will never be needed against him, as against the head, occur, never happened from him in such an amount does not cut off, lest the very existence of the Church was exposed or affected in its essence, because Christ put it on a rock and declared that the powers of hell shall not overcome it. Overall, therefore, apostasy, such któreby placed the pope on one side, and the entire episcopate, on the other hand, it is surely impossible, because of the natural moral forces that Catholicism has in itself, but because of the supernatural, which on the inside and outside the claim the unity and vitality of this great body of the Church.
PRW. Palmleri, De Rom. Pont. Card. Menning, Hist du Conc. du Vatican.
(DJD).
XWS
II. Decisions of the particular synods not infallible and of themselves are not immutable. - Decisions of the ecumenical councils, legally convened, chaired by the Pope to be completed and certified by him, to enjoy the privilege of infallibility and the temperature same token, binding on all Christians to take their act of faith, sincere and irrevocable. Nobody in the Catholic Church does not doubt about this science. After all, Christ had spoken to his apostles: "And I will ask ia Oyca, and give you another Comforter, to live with you forever. Spirit of truth. "(John XIV, 16);" when the Spirit of truth comes, he shall teach you all truth. "(John XVI, 13), and yet innem site:., And the gates of hell shall not prevail him. "(Matt. XVI, 18), ie the Church, which is" the pillar and the affirmation of truth. "(I Tim. III, 15).
obvious consequence of these promises and decisions is that the Church can not be wrong or misleading the faithful make the fullest and most solemn meeting of his teachers, the dogmatic decisions of their councils ecumenical. - This is just one of the infallible dogmatic judgments issued by one of the most ecumenical councils and najpóźniejszych by the Second Vatican Council in the Fourth sessyi d. 18 July 1870, a ruling which teaches us what we have should believe on the importance and seriousness of the decisions of the Pope, "Bishop of Rome, when he speaks ex cathedra, that is, when fulfilling the office of pastor and teacher of all Christians, under the highest apostolic severity, rules that any doctrine concerning faith or morals, should be wierzona by the universal Church, enjoys full, due to him in the promised Holy person. Peter asystencyi divine, that infallibility which the divine Redeemer wished His Church to be endowed, when determining the teaching concerning faith or morals, and therefore, the ruling bishop of Rome is unchangeable by themselves, not by consent of the Church. "Forward reminded Vatican great evidence of this science and known these words of Christ the Lord to St. Peter: "Thou art the rock iest, and tey rock zbuduię church Moy, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it" (Matt. XVI, 16). "Feed my sheep moie, moie sheep pasture" (John XVI, 15 - 17); "ia but I have prayed for thee that thy faith fail not, and you sometimes have turned up. confirm brethren, your "(Luke XXII, 32; - as a former ruling finest cathedrals, such as IV Sat. Constantinople, II Liońskiego and Florence, and became the custom of the Church - as well as continuing the proceedings themselves, even the Supreme Pastors of the Church Fathers that the rulings did not fail to ever show absolute obedience. - As we saw, and believed the Second Vatican Council clearly recalls the dogma of infallibility of the Church, and declares that this is not infallible enjoys another bishop of Rome in its dogmatic decrees, it also declares that the object of that infallibility is a doctrine relating to faith and morals, given to the beliefs of the whole Church, tem and the same token contained in the repository of divine revelation, not personal, but a genuine and public.
III. come across here for two sections of objections, some returned to the infallibility of judgments against the council, the second - striking the infallibility of the pope's decisions, lo not only deny that the ecumenical councils and the Church was infallible dispersed, (of something else where we say: ob. Article. Koncylia, church, etc.), but I say moreover that it is impossible to know when it really is an ecumenical council, and when it is not, that to the dogmatic statements are infallible, it would be necessary to jednozgodnie were taken, which is a thing unheard of in history, and will probably never happen in the future, that science podług all theologians, general council is the only infallible, if he has the infallibility of the pope, which again is doubtful, uncertain, because the Council The Vatican was unable to rule without falling temperature in the same token, some vicious circle of reasoning, that, moreover, all the conciliar decision can not avoid this sofistycznego proceedings; that finally, assuming the papal infallibility, the true and accepted as true, gathered at the Council of Bishops have nothing to judge, nothing to postanawiania, of which again shows the total elimination of any council's decisions, as it clearly appears from the decrees of Vatican Council, which shall be issued in the name of the pope's ruling, with simple approbatą Council. - 2-for papal infallibility That decision is doubtful, because all the Pope issued dogmatic decrees are uncertain. How can anyone believe in the personal infallibility of the human, similar to other people? And if this man has the conditions necessary to give something unmistakably, What is they are and who we infallibly zaręczy that these conditions tend to be preserved? But if there is any doubt in this respect, what shall be required to impose the faithful and the theologians? Who hindered to some nieroztropnemu pope to rule some details, which should not decide, or introduce new products on the faith and morals? What to do then between this pope is wrong adjudicating, and opposing him the bishops? Where will escape the conscience? Where is the fundamental stone of the Church, so many fights wstrzaśnionego?
lo answer, above all, that ekumeniczność councils is a fact very simple and easy to find (now Article. Koncylia). Decisions of councils that they are infallible, they need only be a conciliar, and will reliably takiemi if it will have a majority, including voice, read with the pope, without which there is none most of the council, the Church teaching, as the silent body without a head, a house without a stone Ceremony; unanimous vote would be a very welcome miracle, but not necessary.
- Decisions of the Church in relation to those privileges will not be a vicious circle, because before the Church declared immutable and infallible, and gave intelligent and convincing evidence of his supernatural authority and power of teaching the truth without przymieszki error. He could, therefore, the Church at Vatican ordered the infallibility of his superior does not thereby committing najmniejzego sofizmatu. Here we do not need to settle the theological issues still unsettled, namely whether, regardless of the Roman Pontiff, the body of bishops of the Church has appropriate gift of infallibility; enough of us to say ekumeniczność any council to be quite przeświadczonymi about his infallibility on the dogmatic. The taz as easily, even against the pope's infallible, we recognize the true nature of the doctrinal and legal judgments issued by the bishops in general council, one because of two things, or if those judgments are issued, the Pope had not yet revealed his sentence, and then the matter is not yet exaggerated, the bishops think about it with all the fullest freedom of conscience and faith, strictly speaking, is the effect of their decision, but only after the Pope's appeal, it becomes a high- and unchanging - or the pope delivered his now ex cathedra statement about the test kwestyi by bishops, and the latter can not, of course, think about it differently than the pope, but they can still, with his dignity to give their voices, their condones , its support of the rulings, they may just as he planted together with him, with him and just as he spread the truth, which he spreads around the world, for example, just the same as the priests together with the bishop celebrates the Sacred. eucharistic sacrifice, whether past or even today in the ceremony of priestly, as the bishop and with him, actually consecrate. Thus, although the head of the dogmatic judgments Sat Vatican says Pius IX's name, do not bother, however, that says there is also approbatę conciliar, sacro approbante concilio, and that she was there indeed was given, not as simple an obsequious acquiescence or applause, but as a real effect, and the true testimony of judges and witnesses , together with their supervisor authorized by God to rule the truth contained in the treasury of revelation.
second Thus, the decision of papal infallibility on Sat Vatican neither measure is uncertain, and its undeniable seriousness, it covers all of Pope's ruling, issued ex cathedra from the beginning chrystyanizmn, not that they were in the sleigh and responsible doubtful, but that could be such in relation to the minds that were not sufficiently convinced of these truths irrevocable value. Also unnecessary to add that all the dogmatic decrees, the capital of St. will be able to preach in the future, are already pledged to suddenly advance ruling from the same token, d. 13 July 1870, the truth that man is intrinsically fallible and error is a danger for him, from which It will never be able to protect itself. But is God is not infallible in its essence? Is he not strong enough for it to be able, if willing, to protect man from confusing or misleading or otherwise? Is he not good enough, wise enough to want in his church to prepare a safe haven for the human mind, miotanego waves of opinion and impacted by storms of doubt and negacyi? What he could do, he did, he tells us is the Gospel, and provides Tradycya states, and defines the church, and if the church is determined, ie, that he knows about temperature, holding it, does not need to be afraid of any denials or any weakness of his word, któreby can be frightening defeat him. Through the Holy Spirit. Secure the high, although the Pope is a man, but an enlightened man, and ruled by God, so that the ex cathedra he can decide the truth of God, then it is no longer a man like any other, but similar to those that God chose sometimes to its Members tlómaczów and his will to others. There-is neither pure nor omniscient, nor a miracle-worker, neither inspired nor a prophet, he is only just secured against the ordinary conditions of nature, in circumstances in which it comes to the teaching of the Church, by virtue of his office of Pastor of the universal, not every day and every moment of his life, not as each individual doctor of the Church or as an individual, but only as the Pope, ruling ex cathedra.
sure thing that before any decision is announced dogmatic, are to meet certain preliminary duties: the need to pray, reflect, investigate, inquire of the other, given that the pope is neither inspired nor any prophet. But God gives it that he meets these obligations, and does not allow him to neglect them. So when any decision will be issued by a pope to a healthy mind and freedom in their operations, all well preserved with the conditions laid down by God, but yet this fact alone will not constitute a decision. When they created reasonable doubt about the fact that when it is difficult to clearly above the papal decision to recognize traits of the ex cathedra, then either the pope himself, or his successor will light and the light of this doubt is complete: in the meantime while before it happens, tentative adopted a decree that must be respect and submission which religion prescribes, and which requires respect for the decrees, judgments lower than dogmatic, but higher than normal sentences canonist or theologian (now Article. "Congregation of Rome"). -Is thus unfounded fear zależenia from the pope in their imprudent decisions, the friend of change and novelty, tradycye niepamiętnego to their ancestors. Guardian of such a pope, a naturally dangerous, it will be a supernatural providence, which assystencya promised to Peter and his successors. It's shortcomings are not against the truth, or at least, if you go for his passion, his project will not issue any ruling to the contrary revelation. After all, Christ prayed for Peter in the person made that did not stop his faith and to be able to strengthen his brothers in the faith. So there you will find a never to supervisor, who would as Head of the Church taught error or herezyi. They will never be needed against him, as against the head, occur, never happened from him in such an amount does not cut off, lest the very existence of the Church was exposed or affected in its essence, because Christ put it on a rock and declared that the powers of hell shall not overcome it. Overall, therefore, apostasy, such któreby placed the pope on one side, and the entire episcopate, on the other hand, it is surely impossible, because of the natural moral forces that Catholicism has in itself, but because of the supernatural, which on the inside and outside the claim the unity and vitality of this great body of the Church.
PRW. Palmleri, De Rom. Pont. Card. Menning, Hist du Conc. du Vatican.
(DJD).
XWS
0 comments:
Post a Comment